Inside the Convergence
Do you know Chris?
You know, that Chris. He speaks of Convergence. What is that anyway?
It’s multimedia. The real stuff, not just the marketing dribble used to sell Tandy’s in 1992. This is beyond playing Myst and The Seventh Guest on PC CD-ROM. This is the real deal. It’s what you want, when you want it, how you want it.
Of course, payment is something entirely different. It’s a touchy subject. No netizen I know likes to pay for things. Not a single one. I mean, $4 coffees are cool, but $.50 micropayments are not. I don’t care how good your content is, it will be “stolen” which in our new vocabulary is “sharing.”
But hey, it’s cool. You do what you gotta do to get your content.
Bittorrent of LOST? You got it. Want your news by the truckload? You got it. Download a few Bittorrents while eating your salad and reading your Gmail through your free WiFi? It’s what you gotta do to keep current.
Today’s information highway is a vast ocean of technology and opinons, vying for eyeballs. If Attention is the new Portal, then let me say that AttentionTrust should be paying me for tracking my browsing habits. But they’re not. They don’t want to do that.
And you wanna know why? Because netizens are friggin cheap. We can spend $400 on an X-Box, but we can’t donate $5 to a great site. We want our blogs to be good, interesting, insightful, funny and heartwarming, but holy shit are you a sell out if you want to try and make money doing it (props to Trent).
Me? I haven’t seen an ad in a looong time. I run adblock, I update my HOSTS file to keep away the evil advertisers, desperate to show me something they know in their heart of hearts I’m probably not going to buy.
Am I the only asshole who looks at every product link with suspicion? I want to know if your affiliate username is on the end of your links. I’ve gone so far to simply note the product, load up amazon.com and find the product on my own just to get around the 5% you might make on it.
It’s okay though. It’s “long tail.” It’s “revolutionary marketing.” It’s “attention being number one.”
But no, it’s not. It’s attention for attention’s sake. You’ll receive no money from me. I’ll subscribe to your full RSS feed, but I won’t visit your site. You may even put some banners in your feed, but I’ll block those too. It’s okay, we know you’re trying. But pushing against a netizen is like fighting in the water: By the time you would land a blow, we’re already on a different station. A different provider, another upload or download.
Dear content: We only want to use you. We never loved you. But we’re happy with our one night stand relationship. It’s cute how you try to make me watch commercials on my DVR, even cuter the whole “LOST is on for 1 hour and 1 minute” just so you can screw up our recordings of other shows on other channels. But that doesn’t work. It’s 1980’s tech, VCR recording tech. You should know that by now.
Do you want to know why big media is scared of putting content online? Because of us. Advanced netizens find loopholes and backdoors and create them in code or in gateways or in lookup systems. We don’t want to contribute to your ratings system, we want to build a social network. We don’t want your gimmick, we want the real thing. We’re spoiled and we admit it. We relish in how much we have, from the size of our mp3 collections to our TV show CD-Rs that stack up around our desks.
Convergence is just another cute term for not giving a shit about who made the information we digest, just that we have it. That we can control it. Chris notes, “Control is an illusion.”
But it’s more than an illusion online. It’s a figment. A fleeting dream.
Inside the internet beats the heart of cheapskates. We revel in giving away our best stuff, and we scoff at old capitalism markets. Music became something not to pay for, but to fill space. And there is a lot of space out there, on hard drives and mp3 players and USB keys and laptops.
Are we not entertained? Continuously. And advertising is not entertainment. And so it is filtered away, it is blocked out, it is left behind.
Netizens of the world know this. Citizens are only now realizing it. If 90’s era Napster was the closest you got to free content, you’re just not paying attention.
If I were an ad exec, I’d be saving my pennies. If I were a network exec, I’d be hiding under my desk.
We want to think our opinions and discussions are worth paying for. And they are. But only in the currency of attention, which to a real world consisting of cars and jobs and bills and late payments means absolutely nothing. Relishing in your cable provider’s website doesn’t mean anything to them. Clicking on their advertisements doesn’t lower your bill.
In this new era of eyeballs and keyboards ruling the world, making money is circumspect. Your credibility is all you have online, and tainting that can doom you faster than going on a reality TV show.
Everyone wants convergence except those who we converge with. Those whose content we use. Those whose product has become a commodity, a tradable item, an email attachment.
You have a call on line 1, Mr. Producer. It’s the internet. And we’re coming for your hard work. And the desks. And the office supplies.
And if you fuck with us, we’ll spam you into oblivion and take it anyway. Just so we’re clear.
But we can be nice about things. We can share links and silently giggle while blocking out the content that makes the least sense to us. The onslaught of pop-ups in the 90’s showed what intrusiveness is really like. The convergence of the 00’s shows the world that we’re cheap, we’re not going to leave, and building a better gate isn’t going to keep the cows in.
But Mr. Producer, we’ll throw you a link in our blog. That’s enough in our currency. It’s like a $20 tip for getting us a cup of coffee in the morning. It’s our payment system. No cash, no checks, just eyeballs.
Welcome to the New Net Order.
The Atlantic was born today and I’ll tell you how:
The clouds above it opened up and let it out

5 Comments:
AT sez:
First of all, Jesus H Christ, I had to jump through all sorts of hoops to comment on this. I think I might just spam you for that.
Second of all, you are sooo completely wrong. I'm a child of 1994 just like you are, but man, big content has the internet by the balls. When you realize that the company creating the content is the same one that LEGALLY OWNS the blog you post on, things aren't as open as you say.
The ad execs and content pigs will have to evolve, but they will, and they will be successful because they have the money to limit how we do what we do.
Downloading that Lost? What happens when theres a flag in the video card that won't play it? Or if the flag is in the TV to keep it from heading out? Hell, maybe they'll lobby Intel and AMD to stick something like that slap dab into the processor to keep you from running non DRM'd and paid for content. They do this because they have the money and the power and the connections in .gov to do it, and they'll do it just to spite people like you and me. These are vicious little bastards we're dealing with, and no matter how loud shout that the RIAA and the MPAA and the BSA are racketeering scumbags, we'll lose because they know thats all we can do.
Now, those in the know will always be able to edit code to get away from those flags, but it'll become more and more exclusive. Seen DC++, or most of the smaller torrent sites lately? They're not letting anybody in who isn't part of the club, which makes it no better than a tape swapping circle jerk.
Damn, I lost my point. Anyway, it'd be wonderful if it would happen, but I think its as likely as legalization of drugs, or a revolution in our lifetimes.
Okay, okay, I lowered the restriction for posting (yes, AFTER you jumped through the hoops - What can I say, I'm evil), and as long as the verification word stops spammers, and rude people anons don't their ass, I'll leave it that way.
I wouldn't worry about it now, I've got my thing saved on here anyway.
Many things are different in practice than they are in theory.
In theory, there is no perfect solution to copyright/DRM management.. No matter what security features are implemented, there will always be people out there with enough technical knowledge and incentive to bypass/remove the feature.
In practice, all they can hope to do is make it too complicated to bypass their security features that the user will be inclined to just "pay the fee" rather than go to all the trouble.
As for the firmware argument, aren't "mod chips" big business?
I don't know about the unhackable drm, its a matter of time before they do something that the hackers won't have the resources to beat. Nagra has been encrypting sat dishes for a few years now and (to my knowledge) remains unhacked. The upcoming HD DVD formats are supposed to have millions of encryption keys, as opposed to the few that current DVDs have, that took a few years to crack as is.
On top of that tho, we're going to get to a point where it will be an entirely criminal matter to break drm (moreso than now), and punishable by severe fines. I can see reverse engineering alone getting the same kind of jail time as domestic abuse. How many hackers are going to break DRM if it means a few years in FPMITA prisons?
Could be I'm cynical, and I'd love to see our side win, but I don't think it will. Our side has yet to win at anything in America.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home